Two things can be said for Eric Rudolph, he is consistent in his view of abortion and he was willing to act, not only to speak, and certainly not willing to remain silent. His acts will be judged by God, just as 40,000,000 acts of abortion will also be judged by God.
We live in an amazing time. We are in an uproar over the deprivation of an adult life. We have gone to war, at least partly to stop a man who poisoned his own country men. Our own flesh and blood sons and daughters have lost their lives in Iraq. Yet we have aborted and deprived 40,000,000 from the enjoyment of not only their adult lives, but their post natal infancy, their toddling, their childhood, their puberty, their teenage years and their young adulthood and old age. Why? Why are we not in an uproar, daily in the press and media?
And why do so many support this holocaust of infants, this indiscriminate genocide we call abortion on demand? So the parents of these 40,000,000 escape the duty and expense of raising them. And so they can go on enjoying their sexual acts with no concept of their purpose, or the design of sexual pleasure give in them.
Of course it needs to be said that heathen people, as those who countenance abortion are (at the least they think and act like heathens) not going to understand this, they are lost in the idolatry and worship of their sex organs. They have lost control and wound up pregnant. Their society promotes this at nearly every turn, movies, television, magazines, and internet. Even some of the so called conservative radio talk show hosts in my city (Baltimore Md.) are guilty of some very coarse sexual humor (double entendre).
What is more troublesome is that the so called Christian “churches” are populated by many who support a woman’s right to “choose” her own comforts over the life of the preborn human man or woman. They have certainly forgotten the golden rule, Love your neighbor as yourself. If they thought sincerely about this, the second great commandment of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they might see the child in the womb next door as their neighbor and support his/her cause. Because they do not, they may find soon their consciences seared as with a hot iron, having become past any charitable feeling toward their fellow man, simply interested in old numero uno. I honestly believe the man or woman who will not oppose abortion on demand, which is murder, will ultimately find him/herself in opposition to God.
As for Eric Rudolph, I forgive him his sins of murder, and of presuming to send men and women to their judgement in what may be “pre”mature timing. I do note that God could have stepped in and killed Eric before he ever committed his first murder, yet He “chose” not to do so. May God who mercifully does not kill us all in this moment for our many sins against Him also forgive Eric and take him into His eternal Kingdom. (I have had a nephew/niece? taken from me by abortion, and have also had to forgive my own kin.)
Sincerely, David B. Severy Baltimore, Md. lambsev@yahoo.com www.lambsev.blogspot.com
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Friday, July 01, 2005
Sandra Day O’Connor’s Vacancy
The only issue of any real importance before the Supreme(ly unseemly) Court today is Abortion. Unfortunately the country seems to be without much active protest against this mind numbing heart hardening crime against humanity.
The level of greed indicated by persons who both promote and profit from the "proceedures", and from the absence of "expensive" children is not appalling to a sinner like myself. But God, who chooses our delusions (Isaiah 66:4) never even dreamed of the sacrifice of infants (Jeremiah 32:35).
Who replaces Mrs. O'Connor will be good for the nation only if he/she leads us closer to the day when our posterity is protected from murderers cloaked in medical uniforms spewing "liberal democratic" rhetoric. (liberal and democratic are good words made filthy by these creeps and other kinds of creeps)
Consider that nearly half of the 40,000,000 aborted boys and girls(that's 20 million) would today have already entered the work force or college or the military; and additionally would be paying taxes and Soc.Sec. payroll taxes. It only makes sense to me that we return to the day when we raise our own children and let them enjoy the fruits now being (legally and illegally) offered to the flood of foriegners on our soil.
Well, God got it right again: Proverbs 14:34--->Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. We are reproached every time an illegal fills a job, and everytime a legal alien takes an education and a career out of the country(they call it outsourcing).
Abortion is so hard to think about, you know. But if you don't, and don't oppose it, you will oppose little if any other abomination.
The level of greed indicated by persons who both promote and profit from the "proceedures", and from the absence of "expensive" children is not appalling to a sinner like myself. But God, who chooses our delusions (Isaiah 66:4) never even dreamed of the sacrifice of infants (Jeremiah 32:35).
Who replaces Mrs. O'Connor will be good for the nation only if he/she leads us closer to the day when our posterity is protected from murderers cloaked in medical uniforms spewing "liberal democratic" rhetoric. (liberal and democratic are good words made filthy by these creeps and other kinds of creeps)
Consider that nearly half of the 40,000,000 aborted boys and girls(that's 20 million) would today have already entered the work force or college or the military; and additionally would be paying taxes and Soc.Sec. payroll taxes. It only makes sense to me that we return to the day when we raise our own children and let them enjoy the fruits now being (legally and illegally) offered to the flood of foriegners on our soil.
Well, God got it right again: Proverbs 14:34--->Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. We are reproached every time an illegal fills a job, and everytime a legal alien takes an education and a career out of the country(they call it outsourcing).
Abortion is so hard to think about, you know. But if you don't, and don't oppose it, you will oppose little if any other abomination.
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
The Better Half as Medicine
******************************!*****************************************************
Dearest Ones, great and little,
Here is a part of an article in today's paper. It shows that God was right saying "It is not good for man to be alone.", and "he who finds a wife finds a good thing". May God bless ABUNDANTLY all the faithful wives out there who are blessing, loving and caring for their husbands. Dave, aka lambsev, also at www.lambspoet.blogspot.com aka the Lamb's poet. PS I wonder what research on homosexual male "couples" might show regarding Prostate cancer? D.
Marriage a balm for patients with prostate cancer
By Jennifer Harper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 24, 2005
There's a new secret weapon in the battle against prostate cancer: A wife.
The University of California at Los Angeles announced yesterday that married prostate cancer patients have "significantly improved quality of life" over their single counterparts when facing the rigors of treatment and its aftermath.
Married patients experience an improved sense of "spiritual well-being," fewer adverse effects from treatment and less anxiety about the disease, according to new research. Married men even have less distressing symptoms.
"The message for men with prostate cancer is this: It is good to be partnered and have a support system following treatment," said Dr. Mark Litwin, a urologist with the university's Jonsson Cancer Center.
Prostate cancer is the second-deadliest cancer for men and will strike 232,090 of them this year, according to the American Cancer Society.
Dearest Ones, great and little,
Here is a part of an article in today's paper. It shows that God was right saying "It is not good for man to be alone.", and "he who finds a wife finds a good thing". May God bless ABUNDANTLY all the faithful wives out there who are blessing, loving and caring for their husbands. Dave, aka lambsev, also at www.lambspoet.blogspot.com aka the Lamb's poet. PS I wonder what research on homosexual male "couples" might show regarding Prostate cancer? D.
Marriage a balm for patients with prostate cancer
By Jennifer Harper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 24, 2005
There's a new secret weapon in the battle against prostate cancer: A wife.
The University of California at Los Angeles announced yesterday that married prostate cancer patients have "significantly improved quality of life" over their single counterparts when facing the rigors of treatment and its aftermath.
Married patients experience an improved sense of "spiritual well-being," fewer adverse effects from treatment and less anxiety about the disease, according to new research. Married men even have less distressing symptoms.
"The message for men with prostate cancer is this: It is good to be partnered and have a support system following treatment," said Dr. Mark Litwin, a urologist with the university's Jonsson Cancer Center.
Prostate cancer is the second-deadliest cancer for men and will strike 232,090 of them this year, according to the American Cancer Society.
Sunday, May 15, 2005
"I KNEW THAT!"
Dear Ones, I discovered the following article on the web site www.fresh_hope.com. It's another read it and weep, mourn, wail AND REPENT (TRUE)story. Something we all need to know about, and share; though the crafty devil will try to thwart knowledge of it. Dave
Revealed: how an abortion puts the next baby at risk
By Michael Day (Filed: 15/05/2005)
Having an abortion almost doubles a woman's risk of giving birth dangerously early in a later pregnancy, according to research that will provoke fresh debate over the most controversial of all medical procedures.
A French study of 2,837 births - the first to investigate the link between terminations and extremely premature births - found that mothers who had previously had an abortion were 1.7 times more likely to give birth to a baby at less than 28 weeks' gestation. Many babies born this early die soon after birth, and a large number who survive suffer serious disability.
Peter Bowen-Simpkins: 'termination may have late complications'
The research leader, Dr Caroline Moreau, an epidemiologist at the Hôpital de Bicêtre in Paris, said the results of the study, which appear in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, provided conclusive evidence of a link between induced abortion and subsequent pre-term births.
Last night anti-abortion campaigners seized on the evidence to demand that all women seeking a termination be warned, routinely, that they are jeopardising the well-being of future babies. A series of earlier, smaller studies had failed to provide clear evidence of a link and so women currently opting for an abortion are not warned of the risk.
Dr Moreau said: "Clearly there is a link. The results suggest that induced abortion can damage the cervix in some way that makes a premature birth more likely in subsequent pregnancies."
Her study compared the medical histories of 2,219 women with babies born at less than 34 weeks with another 618 who had given birth at full term. Overall, women who had had an abortion were 40 per cent more likely to have a very pre-term delivery (less than 33 weeks) than those without such a history. The risk of an extremely premature baby - one born at less than 28 weeks - was raised even more sharply, by 70 per cent. Abortion appeared to increase the risk of most major causes of premature birth, including premature rupture of membranes, incorrect position of the foetus on the placenta and spontaneous early labour. The only common cause of premature birth not linked to abortion was high blood pressure.
Mr Peter Bowen-Simpkins, a spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and a consultant obstetrician at the Sancta Maria Hospital in Swansea, said the study revealed that abortion might not be as safe as previously supposed. "This study shows that surgical termination of pregnancies may have late complications and may not be without risk," he said.
About 185,000 women have abortions in Britain each year, for social or medical reasons, and last night anti-abortion campaigners seized upon the new study as evidence that the risks have been underplayed.
Jack Scarisbrick, the chairman of the campaign group Life, said: ''We have been saying for years that surgical abortion inevitably increases the risk of later problems. It seems that the abortion procedure carries with it risks that women will know nothing about until they become pregnant with a 'wanted' child later on."
About 80,000 babies in the UK and Ireland are born prematurely each year; 17,000 of these need intensive care.
A spokesman for Marie Stopes International, which is the largest provider of abortions outside the NHS, said that women seeking terminations were not told of increased risks of premature births "because so far, they have not been established".
Revealed: how an abortion puts the next baby at risk
By Michael Day (Filed: 15/05/2005)
Having an abortion almost doubles a woman's risk of giving birth dangerously early in a later pregnancy, according to research that will provoke fresh debate over the most controversial of all medical procedures.
A French study of 2,837 births - the first to investigate the link between terminations and extremely premature births - found that mothers who had previously had an abortion were 1.7 times more likely to give birth to a baby at less than 28 weeks' gestation. Many babies born this early die soon after birth, and a large number who survive suffer serious disability.
Peter Bowen-Simpkins: 'termination may have late complications'
The research leader, Dr Caroline Moreau, an epidemiologist at the Hôpital de Bicêtre in Paris, said the results of the study, which appear in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, provided conclusive evidence of a link between induced abortion and subsequent pre-term births.
Last night anti-abortion campaigners seized on the evidence to demand that all women seeking a termination be warned, routinely, that they are jeopardising the well-being of future babies. A series of earlier, smaller studies had failed to provide clear evidence of a link and so women currently opting for an abortion are not warned of the risk.
Dr Moreau said: "Clearly there is a link. The results suggest that induced abortion can damage the cervix in some way that makes a premature birth more likely in subsequent pregnancies."
Her study compared the medical histories of 2,219 women with babies born at less than 34 weeks with another 618 who had given birth at full term. Overall, women who had had an abortion were 40 per cent more likely to have a very pre-term delivery (less than 33 weeks) than those without such a history. The risk of an extremely premature baby - one born at less than 28 weeks - was raised even more sharply, by 70 per cent. Abortion appeared to increase the risk of most major causes of premature birth, including premature rupture of membranes, incorrect position of the foetus on the placenta and spontaneous early labour. The only common cause of premature birth not linked to abortion was high blood pressure.
Mr Peter Bowen-Simpkins, a spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and a consultant obstetrician at the Sancta Maria Hospital in Swansea, said the study revealed that abortion might not be as safe as previously supposed. "This study shows that surgical termination of pregnancies may have late complications and may not be without risk," he said.
About 185,000 women have abortions in Britain each year, for social or medical reasons, and last night anti-abortion campaigners seized upon the new study as evidence that the risks have been underplayed.
Jack Scarisbrick, the chairman of the campaign group Life, said: ''We have been saying for years that surgical abortion inevitably increases the risk of later problems. It seems that the abortion procedure carries with it risks that women will know nothing about until they become pregnant with a 'wanted' child later on."
About 80,000 babies in the UK and Ireland are born prematurely each year; 17,000 of these need intensive care.
A spokesman for Marie Stopes International, which is the largest provider of abortions outside the NHS, said that women seeking terminations were not told of increased risks of premature births "because so far, they have not been established".
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
photo of the CENTURY
Dear ones,
again, this story with its amazing photo is worthy of another
post. click on:
www.family.org/fofmag/sl/a0024070.cfm
you've never seen anything quite like this, i'm sure
again, this story with its amazing photo is worthy of another
post. click on:
www.family.org/fofmag/sl/a0024070.cfm
you've never seen anything quite like this, i'm sure
Saturday, October 16, 2004
little lambs
Dear Ones, When I started the blog I was an ametuer. Well, I'm still an ametuer, but the new name better reflects the blog's purpose, don;t you think? lambsev
Thursday, October 07, 2004
More Abortion Facts
I'm still looking for the site I copied this list from, I want to give credit and make the site accessable, lambsev
Abortion is the medically induced, premature death of a pre-born baby in the womb. There are several methods used:
*** Suction Aspiration
The method of abortion most commonly used in first trimester abortions. A powerful vacuum suction tube is put into the dilated uterus. The suction tears the soft baby apart and removes it from the uterus.
*** Dilation and Curettage (D&C)
The dilation of the cervix which permits the insertion of a sharp surgical instrument will be used to dismember the baby's developing body.
*** Dilatation and Evacuation (D&E)
Used after 12 weeks, this method is identical to the D&C method except that forceps are used to twist and tear away the body that now has calcified bones.
*** Salt Poisoning (Saline Injection)
Used after 16 weeks. A long needle is inserted into the mothers abdomen into the baby's sac. The baby breathes in swallowing the deadly toxin and is poisoned. The mother delivers a dead or dying baby.
*** Prostaglandin
Hormones, developed by the Upjohn Pharmaceutical Co., are injected into the amniotic sac to induce contractions. In an article about this method, one of the complications listed was 'live birth'.
*** Hysterectomy
Similar to a Cesarean Section, this method employed by abortionists almost always results in a live birth. The baby is left to die by neglect or direct art.
*** Dilatation and Extraction (D&X)
By pulling on the baby's legs with forceps, the legs arc delivered, followed by the torso, arms and shoulders. The baby's head 'usually' remains inside the uterus. Using blunt-tipped surgical scissors, the baby's skull is pierced where a suction catheter is inserted to extract the 'skull contents.' Fetal brains and organs are used for fetal 'tissue' experimentation.
No Safe Abortions
There is no such thing as "a safe legal abortion." Abortion is a decriminalized crime against humanity.
Many women often experience debilitating physical and psychological complications. As Christians, we know Jesus Christ will forgive us of all confessed and repented sin. Unfortunately, some women and men have a hard time
forgiving themselves and are thus hindered in their growth.
Abortion is the medically induced, premature death of a pre-born baby in the womb. There are several methods used:
*** Suction Aspiration
The method of abortion most commonly used in first trimester abortions. A powerful vacuum suction tube is put into the dilated uterus. The suction tears the soft baby apart and removes it from the uterus.
*** Dilation and Curettage (D&C)
The dilation of the cervix which permits the insertion of a sharp surgical instrument will be used to dismember the baby's developing body.
*** Dilatation and Evacuation (D&E)
Used after 12 weeks, this method is identical to the D&C method except that forceps are used to twist and tear away the body that now has calcified bones.
*** Salt Poisoning (Saline Injection)
Used after 16 weeks. A long needle is inserted into the mothers abdomen into the baby's sac. The baby breathes in swallowing the deadly toxin and is poisoned. The mother delivers a dead or dying baby.
*** Prostaglandin
Hormones, developed by the Upjohn Pharmaceutical Co., are injected into the amniotic sac to induce contractions. In an article about this method, one of the complications listed was 'live birth'.
*** Hysterectomy
Similar to a Cesarean Section, this method employed by abortionists almost always results in a live birth. The baby is left to die by neglect or direct art.
*** Dilatation and Extraction (D&X)
By pulling on the baby's legs with forceps, the legs arc delivered, followed by the torso, arms and shoulders. The baby's head 'usually' remains inside the uterus. Using blunt-tipped surgical scissors, the baby's skull is pierced where a suction catheter is inserted to extract the 'skull contents.' Fetal brains and organs are used for fetal 'tissue' experimentation.
No Safe Abortions
There is no such thing as "a safe legal abortion." Abortion is a decriminalized crime against humanity.
Many women often experience debilitating physical and psychological complications. As Christians, we know Jesus Christ will forgive us of all confessed and repented sin. Unfortunately, some women and men have a hard time
forgiving themselves and are thus hindered in their growth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
